When I say I have an off the wall theory I mean off the wall. I believe that what caused the Haiti quake also caused the Baja quake. The North American plate is rotating counterclockwise. The poor little Gonave micro plate is sandwiched between the North American plate and the Caribbean plate and is being crushed, twisted shoved this way and that so much so that it is slowly being destroyed.
The Haiti quake was a strike slip quake with just a tiny bit of down slip. The Gonave micro plate in relationship to the North American plate is moving east.
The Pacific plate is moving northwest in relationship to the North American plate is moving southeast. However since the North American plate is rotating counterclockwise California is slowly but surly being torn away from the North American plate. In time all of California west of the Sierras with with either be a peninsula or an island. By the way, the over all movement of the Pacific plate is also counterclockwise. That is one of the reason Japan catches hell all the time.
The Baja quake was a strike slip quake with just a tiny bit of of down slip. This tells me it was the Pacific plate that moved, but don't hold me to that. I reserved the right to be wrong. What this did to the faults in California is hard to say, but I'm sure it weakened some and strengthen some. I guess you could say it brought us closer, much closer to the day Southern California will have its quake and what a whopper it's going to be.
The old saying “that anything is possible” goes here, but how probable it is is what counts. My feeling is that the probability of my theory is very, very low. But it is something to think on.
This is just a guess on my part, but the quake could occur on San Andreas fault, the Elsinore fault, or somewhere in the Eastern California Shear Zone/Walker Lane Belt.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=122531261
http://www.earth.northwestern.edu/people/seth/demos/PLATE/plate.html
http://www.spring.net/geo/JohnVolos/Public/Portal/EARTH_MECHAN/structure_of_the_earth.htm#a10
The Haiti quake was a strike slip quake with just a tiny bit of down slip. The Gonave micro plate in relationship to the North American plate is moving east.
The Pacific plate is moving northwest in relationship to the North American plate is moving southeast. However since the North American plate is rotating counterclockwise California is slowly but surly being torn away from the North American plate. In time all of California west of the Sierras with with either be a peninsula or an island. By the way, the over all movement of the Pacific plate is also counterclockwise. That is one of the reason Japan catches hell all the time.
The Baja quake was a strike slip quake with just a tiny bit of of down slip. This tells me it was the Pacific plate that moved, but don't hold me to that. I reserved the right to be wrong. What this did to the faults in California is hard to say, but I'm sure it weakened some and strengthen some. I guess you could say it brought us closer, much closer to the day Southern California will have its quake and what a whopper it's going to be.
The old saying “that anything is possible” goes here, but how probable it is is what counts. My feeling is that the probability of my theory is very, very low. But it is something to think on.
This is just a guess on my part, but the quake could occur on San Andreas fault, the Elsinore fault, or somewhere in the Eastern California Shear Zone/Walker Lane Belt.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=122531261
http://www.earth.northwestern.edu/people/seth/demos/PLATE/plate.html
http://www.spring.net/geo/JohnVolos/Public/Portal/EARTH_MECHAN/structure_of_the_earth.htm#a10