Seems like an awful lot of aftershocks? Wonder if it is the type of fault or what. Does it make pressure build up elsewhere? Any thoughts info input would be appreciated. Curious
Blessings Sara
Blessings Sara
Forum for earth sensitives, world events, disasters, dreams, prophecies, visions, predictions.. everything and anything welcome here!
Conch23 wrote:Seems like an awful lot of aftershocks? Wonder if it is the type of fault or what. Does it make pressure build up elsewhere? Any thoughts info input would be appreciated. Curious
Blessings Sara
NiteOwlSoCal wrote:Conch23 wrote:Seems like an awful lot of aftershocks? Wonder if it is the type of fault or what. Does it make pressure build up elsewhere? Any thoughts info input would be appreciated. Curious
Blessings Sara
I've been wondering the same thing. I can't recall ever seeing quite so many aftershocks (covering such a wide area) before, not even after the Sumatra quake. Seems like that 8.8 in Chile made the entire area unstable.
socalshakin wrote:NiteOwlSoCal wrote:Conch23 wrote:Seems like an awful lot of aftershocks? Wonder if it is the type of fault or what. Does it make pressure build up elsewhere? Any thoughts info input would be appreciated. Curious
Blessings Sara
I've been wondering the same thing. I can't recall ever seeing quite so many aftershocks (covering such a wide area) before, not even after the Sumatra quake. Seems like that 8.8 in Chile made the entire area unstable.
This was a huge quake and occured on a subduction zone, so I am not surprised by the amount of aftershocks. They'll likely die down over the next week.
NiteOwlSoCal wrote:socalshakin wrote:NiteOwlSoCal wrote:Conch23 wrote:Seems like an awful lot of aftershocks? Wonder if it is the type of fault or what. Does it make pressure build up elsewhere? Any thoughts info input would be appreciated. Curious
Blessings Sara
I've been wondering the same thing. I can't recall ever seeing quite so many aftershocks (covering such a wide area) before, not even after the Sumatra quake. Seems like that 8.8 in Chile made the entire area unstable.
This was a huge quake and occured on a subduction zone, so I am not surprised by the amount of aftershocks. They'll likely die down over the next week.
I guess there WERE that many aftershocks following the 2004 Sumatra quake--I just didn't remember there being quite as many as for this 8.8 in Chile. I just did some searching and found this map (of Sumatra aftershocks):
Don in Hollister wrote:Hi Conch23. The rupture is around 416 miles long so with that kind of rupture you're going to get a lot of aftershocks. Take Care...Don
https://2img.net/h/i5.photobucket.com/albums/y151/Quakemeister/Chile88Mquake02-27-2010.jpg?t=1267421181[url][/url]